| Responding to the Environmental Extremes and the Economics of the Times |
| Friday, 11 December 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Walking down the riverbeds and around the deltas, it is easy to
see people getting on with their lives in ways that are covering up the
scars of disaster: an ongoing environmental crisis of management.
Environmental disaster is made worse by the economic crisis; the poor
do not know how they will be next hit, by a returning jobless family
member or another typhoon.
The extremes in both weather conditions and geological events are gaining more focus, brought about mainly by the massive costs to damaged infrastructure, crop and agricultural productivity losses, and tragically, the number of lives lost and those left homeless. Relief responses are stretched more thinly as disaster occurrences are getting more frequent. Rehabilitation and reconstruction responses are facing design and land allocation challenges. The message is getting home that as human lives are connected, so are economies and so too the apparently distinct activities across the landscape; every development' must bear the cost of environmental balancing. The economic drive by the national government is increasingly focused on a strategy of short-term natural resource utilization with limited focus on long-term sustainability of these resources. Investment opportunities that rely on the nation's raw natural resources include metallic mineral development, river and stone quarrying, agricultural land expansion, plantations, extensive chemical usage for crop protection and fertilization, local wood supply for domestic consumption, marine and fisheries resources, freshwater usage for industries, tourism, and increased office and housing areas. Whether you are part of the 50% of the world population now living in cities or the 50% left on the land, the environment through heat and water is pressuring daily life in the best of times. The impact of an El Niņo and La Niņa event in upland and coastal areas and the communities living in these areas demand a response that goes beyond relief. Extreme rainfall events that trigger landslides, mudflows, massive soil loss and flooding are paralleled by extreme droughts that bring about severe losses in agricultural productivity and elevates seasonal hunger in poverty-stricken areas to extended hunger periods for many more. In climate change discussions preparing for the UN Framework Convention in Bonn 29th March to 8th April, it is recognized that there is a need to have a focus on community adaptation and effective resource management, not simply mitigation. While feats of engineering boost economies and generally secure urban needs, local efforts on a broad scale have to adapt to, rather than control, the flow of nature. People have been adapting in their efforts to survive. Greater support is needed in this for communities to secure a relation with the land and water during times of stress that these stress times do not have to always become a disaster. Most Asian countries have a difficulty at the negotiation table. For although the carbon print has to be offset primarily by the industrial giants worldwide, the difficulty of such countries as the Philippines is to know critically the amount of carbon we already offset, while at the same time argue that we face the greater problem of the effects of the global change, given the existing poverty and exposure to impact. We have no bargaining power. PHOTO GALLERY:
The work of the Environmental Science for Social Change or ESSC, (www.essc.org.ph), a Jesuit research institution in the Philippines that works with communities and local governments for effective natural resource management, is premised on:
The need to understand the ecological dynamics between people and their immediate environment ESSC's work programs are focused on forest cover update and watershed integration, tracking mining, community resource management and culture, developing disaster resilience by broadening the disaster discourse, and capacity building. The environment continues to function as the nation's resource base for essential products and to support broad-scale development. It is the same environment that supports critical livelihood activities of upland and coastal communities and provides ecological services for the country. As we draw life and extract resources from the environment, there is a critical need to ensure the sustainability of the environment and regeneration of resources through effective management. However, continuing political and social neglect of the core decisions and actions is straining the environment to a much greater extent than the renewal and regeneration occurring. The vision is to reverse this trend and attain the needed environmental balance and viable growth. And in a context of increasing awareness and information on the impact of climate change in countries such as the Philippines, this vision must be enabled by extreme human intellect and creativity, care and compassion. 22 March 2009
Environmental Science for Social Change (ESSC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Friday, 11 December 2009 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||